Community Academic Partnership (CAP) Patient Safety
| Date | Presentation | |
|---|---|---|
| 09/18/2008 | ![]() | J. Halbesleben View descriptionWorkarounds are idiosyncratic solutions to perceived blocks in work flow. While they are widely acknowledged by health care professionals, there remains relatively little research on the impact that they have on health care professionals and patients.
This talk summarizes a AHRQ- and NIOSH-funded stream of research examining how workarounds influence patient safety and nurse safety and occupational health. Through both quantitative and qualitative research designs, our research echoes significant concerns about patient safety from the literature, particularly in the medication process.
Moreover, our research extends the literature by finding that workarounds can also lead to high levels of stress and increase risk of occupational injuries for nurses. In addition to sharing our findings, I discuss the implications of our findings for work design and patient safety. |
| 05/01/2008 | ![]() | R. Wears View descriptionConcerns about the safety and quality of health care have created the 'patient safety movement' and led to a wide variety of activity. Although many may not have realized it, there is a great debate about the best strategy for effecting improvement that carries over into debates about the quality of 'evidence' and what constitutes scientific activity.
This debate is rooted in underlying and often unrecognized differences in the philosophies of science and additionally is divided along social and professional lines, with healthcare researchers tending to assuming one side, and human factors professionals taking the other. We will explore these competing approaches, using the problems associated with handoffs in clinical work as an exemplar. |
| 11/10/2007 | ![]() | M. Weinger View descriptionMatthew Weinger, MD, provides an overview of 15 years of human factors research on point-of-care work processes in the medical domain, primarily in anesthesiology. Research projects to be discussed include field observations, device evaluations, and controlled studies in both real and simulated care environments. Methods for the conduct of task analysis, workload assessment, and event analysis will be emphasized. |
| 05/04/2007 | ![]() | B. Karsh View descriptionThe Institute of Medicine estimates that, on average, a hospitalized patient is subject to 1 medication administration error/day. While that estimate is powerful on its own, it may be more significant for children.
In this presentation early results from an AHRQ-funded study on pediatric patient safety are presented. Specifically, data is provided on (a) predictors of medication administration violations and (b) the relationships among various measures of workload and outcomes such as nurse burnout and medication error likelihood. Implications for pediatric medication safety will be discussed. |
| 04/27/2007 | ![]() | A. Schoofs Hundt View descriptionSignificant attention is being paid to translational research applied to health care – both clinically and administratively. In this lecture, Hundt presents an overview of translational research and the impact human factors engineering translational research can have in affecting change in health care, specifically applied to HIT. Experience from two HIT-related grants in which both prospective risk analysis and usability evaluation methods were incorporated will be discussed. |
| 04/20/2007 | ![]() | C. Nemeth View descriptionHealthcare is variable, contingent, complex, evanescent work domain. Systems such as information technology (IT) that are intended to support healthcare are often brittle; unable to adapt in the face of such change. Clinicians have developed subtle and well-tuned ways to match resources to variation in demand volume and quality.
Their initiatives make it possible for healthcare teams to adapt and survive despite challenges…to be resilient. System developers can learn about how healthcare workers perform in such settings, but need appropriate methods to be effective and efficient. The study of cognitive artifacts can reveal meaningful information about the healthcare setting and how clinicians create resilience. Insights from such research are way to develop resilient systems and to improve healthcare safety. |
| 02/23/2007 | ![]() | P. Micheli, J. Mills View descriptionPaul Micheli and Julie Mills are Usability Engineers at GE Healthcare in their anesthesia and ventilator division. They discuss how they take in account patient safety initiatives in their user interface design work. The focus is the importance of good user interface designs for anesthesia and ventilator devices. |
| 02/09/2007 | ![]() | D. Wiegmann View descriptionError-free performance is commonly viewed as the key marker of surgical excellence. This talk presents data showing that even highly experienced surgical teams can err as a result of minor problems that disrupt “surgical flow.” Potential human factors interventions that reduce flow disruptions and allow surgical teams to achieve surgical excellence will be discussed. |
| 02/02/2007 | ![]() | M. O'Neil View descriptionMichael O'Neil, PhD, addresses the importance of a "user-centered" approach to design and management of healthcare environments. Users include patients, visitors and staff. This presentation asserts that assessment of healthcare facility quality must go beyond existing (important) measures of patient health outcomes, and include the impact of design of space on the quality of the user experience. A Six-Sigma based approach to implementing user-centered quality measures is then discussed. O'Neil's current research on Cancer Treatment Centers will also be briefly addressed. |










